August 12, 2026

The EIS Ceiling Just Doubled. The Queue Just Got Longer.

On 6 April 2026, the amount a UK company can raise under the Enterprise Investment Scheme in a single year went from £5m to £10m. The lifetime cap doubled to £24m. The pre-investment gross asset test rose from £15m to £30m. It is the biggest expansion of the scheme in over two decades.

Read the headline and you would assume raising EIS money just got easier. It didn't. Raising more EIS money got easier — for the companies that can get through the door in the first place.

The door is advance assurance

Before most angels will wire, they want HMRC's advance assurance that the shares will qualify. It is the most boring, most load-bearing document in a UK seed round.

HMRC's figures, published in May 2026, show what is happening at that gate. In 2025 to 2026, HMRC received 3,310 EIS advance assurance applications — up 4% on the year before — and as of March 2026 had approved 72%. On the SEIS side, applications jumped 24% to 4,085, with 76% approved so far. The 2024 to 2025 SEIS cohort finished at 85%.

Some 2025 to 2026 applications are still being processed, so those rates will move. But the shape is hard to miss: more founders are asking, and a bigger share are sitting in the not-yet-approved pile.

What actually gets an application knocked back

Advance assurance is not a pitch. HMRC is not judging whether yours is a good business. It is working through a checklist: qualifying trade, risk-to-capital, gross assets, headcount, company age, and how the money will be spent.

What sinks applications is rarely ambition. It is an application that cannot evidence its own claims. A vague use of funds. Figures in the application that don't reconcile to the filed accounts. A business plan saying one thing and a financial model saying another.

The risk-to-capital condition is where most of the judgement sits. It asks two questions: does the company have genuine objectives to grow and develop over the long term, and is there a real risk of loss to the investor? Both are answered by your model, not your deck. If your projections show a smooth, riskless glide to profitability, you have accidentally argued yourself out of the scheme.

The concentration nobody mentions

In 2024 to 2025, companies registered in London and the South East took 60% of all EIS investment and 66% of all SEIS investment. Information and Communication alone accounted for 35% of EIS money and 42% of SEIS money.

If you are a hardware business in Leeds or a services business in Newcastle, you are not only competing for capital. You are competing against a pattern the whole system is calibrated around. That is not a reason to give up. It is a reason to be twice as tight on the parts you control.

Headroom only helps if you can use it

The doubled caps are genuinely useful for companies that had hit the old ceiling and thought their EIS route was closed. Worth noting too: EIS income tax relief held at 30% while VCT relief dropped to 20% on the same date, which is likely to push investors toward direct EIS.

But headroom is only worth something if your compliance position keeps pace with it. Every EIS round adds a compliance statement, a share class and a set of conditions you must keep meeting for three years after the money lands. Companies that raise fast and file slowly find out at exit — the worst possible moment to discover a relief has been withdrawn.

What ready actually looks like

It is a short list, and none of it is glamorous. A financial model that ties to your statutory accounts. A use of funds you would happily defend line by line. A cap table that reflects reality, options included. Three years of clean filings. And a straight answer to the question what happens if this doesn't work — because that is the question the risk-to-capital condition is really asking.

None of that requires a full-time CFO on £120k. All of it requires someone who has done it before, sitting with your numbers for a few days rather than a few minutes.

Raising in the next six months and not certain your model would survive an advance assurance read-through? Take a free hour with us and we'll pressure-test it before HMRC does — no pitch, no boring numbers. Finance leadership, without the headcount.

Sources: HMRC, "Enterprise Investment Scheme and Seed Enterprise Investment Scheme: 2026," gov.uk ; FounderCatalyst, "What's Changed: EMI and EIS Reforms from 6 April 2026," foundercatalyst.com